EhSteve99 on Xanga

EhSteve99

Name: Douglas
Gender: Male

Interests: Programming, some other stuff. Mostly computers. But don't get me wrong, I'm a nerd, not a geek. There's a distinction.
Expertise: Visual Basic 6.0. Hmm... I need some more expertise. I'm gonna go teach myself some C++. But then again, C++ is for children. A true Klingon code warrior uses only raw machine code, keyed in on the front panel switches in pure binary.

Message: message me

Member Since: 12/17/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
Subscribe to EhSteve99 Get trial subscription

Blogrings

Posting Calendar

\|<< oldest \| newest >>\|
view all weblog archives

Monday, June 11, 2007

Please Read This: Max Berry's Discourse, explains why I like Linux

About nine months ago I switched from Microsoft Windows to Gentoo Linux. I wasn’t unhappy with Windows, but Linux is very handy when you’re designing a web site, and I got sick of rebooting all the time to switch from one to the other. So I decided to suck it up and go all the way.

This turned out to be a lot like moving to another country, both in the sense that I didn’t know where anything was or understand the local language, and because I realized things about the place I’d left. So here’s what I learned.

(Note: There are several different types of Linux, and they each do some things better than the others. Not all my comments apply to all Linux distributions. But I’m still going to just say “Linux.”)

Linux is a religion. When you first hear about Linux, it’s from slightly creepy people whose eyes shine with a born-again fervor while they rattle on about all kinds of things you don’t understand. I have become one of those people. There really needs to be some kind of warning sticker on the CD: “May cause you to blog about the philosophies of operating systems.” I mention this up front because it helps to explain everything else.
Windows thinks you’re an idiot; Linux thinks you’re a genius. What I love about Windows is that no matter what it asks you to do, you can choose the default and it works. You can actually install software by inserting the CD, closing your eyes, and hitting ENTER over and over again. You have no idea what you’re doing, but you don’t care.

Linux, on the other hand, wouldn’t dare to assume it knows what you want. There’s hardly a default setting on anything, anywhere. Naturally you will want to do some in-depth reading about horizontal frequency rates before leaping into anything as advanced as displaying a picture on the screen, right? The first time you do anything in Linux, you come away with an education.

Each approach is handy at different times. It’s very handy being treated as an idiot, until you want to do something smart. Then it’s annoying.
Windows plays soccer; Linux plays rugby. In soccer (sorry, to me this is football), whenever one player makes the slightest contact with another, he collapses to ground, writhing in agony and clutching at his ankle. Everyone gathers around and looks very worried until the referee holds up a yellow card and then—amazing!—the player springs up again, completely cured. So too Windows: as soon as anything goes wrong with any program, the whole thing collapses in a screaming heap, and requires a reboot. Linux, on the other hand, shrugs off application failures like a rugby player ignores broken fingers. Programs crash, but Linux keeps going.
Linux marketing sucks. Microsoft is a corporation with an overriding financial interest in persuading people to buy Windows. The people who make Linux, on the other hand, are mostly volunteers who simply love building good code. So while there are plenty of Microsoft advertisements and salespeople and lobbyists to tell the government that you can’t trust Linux, there is practically nobody on the other side. It’s always a bit creepy when you have a big corporation up against a non-profit or non-entity; you end up being told that sugared drinks are better for you than water, you wouldn’t dare breast-feed your baby when good old manufactured formula is available, and there’s no such thing as global warming. Linux people don’t merely lack the funding to match Microsoft’s marketing; they also don’t really want to. The Linux attitude is that they have built a magnificent operating system and if you can’t see that, well, that’s your problem. So Microsoft’s aim is to sell operating systems while Linux people focus on building them.

Windows lets you, Linux unleashes you. Occasionally I see the phrase “lets you” in discussions of Windows software—as in, “This software lets you press C to get a preview.” The idea that you are not allowed to do anything to your computer unless it “lets you” is, I realized, very Microsoftian. Because in Linux, you can do whatever the hell you want to pretty much any piece of code: improve it, change it, or break it. Not that you need to, because everything is incredibly customizable already, but you can. If you complain about any piece of software in Linux, you stand a good chance of being told, “Well go make it better, then.” By comparison, Microsoft asks, “Where do you want to go today?” but then strongly recommends you select: “Default.”

Windows gets in your face. Like an annoying four-year-old, Windows can’t go two minutes without attention. You boot, start to do something, and suddenly there windows are flying at your face. Everything is checking for updates or activating or deactivating or switching channels and IT HAS TO TELL YOU THIS RIGHT NOW. Linux puts its messages in the log, and you read them when and if you feel like it.

Windows fails silently. Oh my God. Before, I never even noticed this. But now every time I have to use Windows I end up bug-eyed and yelling at the screen, “Just tell me what’s wrong!” When something goes wrong in Linux, it spews messages into the system log, which you can read through to see what it was doing. Then you copy a phrase or two into Google, click Search, and choose from a list of pages competing to tell you exactly what the problem is and how to fix it.

Windows doesn’t do this. Windows doesn’t even have a system log, as far as I know. When things go wrong, they do so mysteriously and without complaint: you click buttons and nothing happens, or you try to run a program and it just vanishes. There’s no way to discover what the actual problem is. If you Google for the symptoms, you find endless pages complaining about the same thing, but no solutions. Or you do find solutions, but they all come down to the same thing: (1) Reboot (2) Reinstall. They should issue a Microsoft Support Manual that contains nothing except these two words, because that’s the solution to every single Windows problem. Even if you manage to fix it, you never find out what exactly the problem is; you just grope around blindly reinstalling things until suddenly and just as mysteriously things start working again. The other day I e-mailed a company’s tech support and their semi-automated advice was to reinstall their program and Windows XP. If that didn’t work, I was to e-mail again to get help from a human. That’s right, wiping my hard drive was the first step in their diagnoses process. This is like having to get a heart transplant before the doctor will see you about your hiccups.

The end result is that even though Windows is simpler to get to grips with, I never felt really confident with it, because I couldn’t tell what it’s doing. Linux requires more understanding, but when you’ve got that, you’re more assured.

Linux people rock. One day my Windows PC choked on an automatic security update, and thereafter every time it tried to update itself, it failed. Having an unpatched Windows computer connected to the internet is like walking through a bad neighborhood tossing your BMW car keys from hand to hand, so I wanted to do something about this. There was no error message, of course, aside from the gloriously unhelpful, “The update failed to install.” I ended up going through the maze of Microsoft’s technical support to send in a problem report. I received an automated e-mail back saying my report had been received, then nothing. Weeks went by. I tried again. Same thing. Then one day, it just started working again.

Of course, this is not specific to Microsoft. Pretty much every company treats a support customer like something they just stepped in: their aim is to get rid of you with as little touching as possible. I can’t remember the last time I e-mailed a company for support and it didn’t go like this:
1. Receive automated response suggesting I look in FAQs
2. Receive response from alleged human being that consists of copy-and-pasted text from FAQ
3. I write back thanking them for the information and expressing regret that none of it is remotely relevant to the problem I described
4. Human being actually reads my e-mail starts being helpful.
By which time I figure out the problem myself.

The other day I had some trouble getting a piece of hardware working on my Linux machine, and found a web site by
a guy who had written Linux drivers for it. Not because it was his job; he just felt like it. The hardware was Australian-specific and Google wasn’t helping much, so I e-mailed him a question, not really expecting a reply—because it’s a bit like e-mailing Bill Gates to ask what that DOS command is that displays all the directories. (Or would be if Gates actually wrote DOS. Bada boom! Sorry. I’m sorry. See point #1.) He wrote right back with the answer.

1:44 PM - 18 views - 6 eprops - 3 comments - email it

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Jericho

That TV show, Jericho? I'm watching it right now. The one with all the nukes going off all over the U.S, and the people in Jericho don't know what's going on or what to do next? Guess what the first thing they do is? Do they build a generator? Do they restore the water pumps? Purifiers? Assign people jobs relevant to survival? Plant farms?

Nope.

They build a still.

Yep. They're about to die from radiation poisoning (maybe), and they build a still so they don't have to worry about running out of booze. They have no power, no running water, and an EMP just got detonated so anything that used to have a circuit board just died. And they're worried about running low on booze.

To be fair, they did find a random generator out in a field for some reason never fully explained (It had a chinese flag on it), and the train bringing food supplies and etc. items got derailed and they found it. But before all that, they build a still?

Some writer has a sense of humor meant for those trained in survival. Most people wouldn't think that's as funny as I do. But hey, you just got my 2.3534 cents (This item uses 98% of bag space).

8:20 PM - 28 views - 2 eprops - 4 comments - email it

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Currently Listening
Letters to the President
By Hawk Nelson
see related

5:33 PM - 604 views - 4 eprops - 3 comments - email it

Monday, April 09, 2007

Driving humor

When you see a bad driver and wonder where the heck he is from because of his bad driving, this list may just help you out.

WAYS TO TELL WHERE DRIVING PEOPLE COME FROM

1. One hand on wheel, one hand on horn: CHICAGO

2. One hand on wheel, one finger out window: NEW YORK

3. One hand on wheel, one finger out window, cutting across all lanes of traffic: NEW JERSEY

4. One hand on wheel, one hand on newspaper, foot solidly on accelerator: BOSTON

5. One hand on wheel, one hand on nonfat double decaf cappuccino, cradling cell phone, brick on accelerator, gun in lap: LOS ANGELES

6. Both hands on wheel, eyes shut, both feet on brake, quivering in terror: OHIO, but driving in CALIFORNIA

7. Waving at everyone that you pass, eating a moon pie, sipping an RC, smiling and chewing and talking to
yourself: TENNESSEE

8. One hand on 12 oz. Double shot latte, one knee on wheel, cradling cell phone, foot on brake, mind on radio game, banging head on steering wheel while stuck in traffic: SEATTLE

9. One hand on wheel, one hand on hunting rifle, alternating between both feet being on the accelerator
and both feet on brake, throwing McDonald's bag out the window: TEXAS

10. Four-wheel drive pick-up truck, shotgun mounted in rear window, beer cans on floor, squirrel tails attached to antenna: ALABAMA

11. Two hands gripping wheel, blue hair barely visible above windshield, driving 35 on the Interstate in the left lane with the left blinker on: FLORIDA

12. Knee up against steering wheel, one hand on Tim Horton's coffee cup, cell phone in ear, accelerator to
the floor, applying makeup/doing crossword puzzle/ reading morning Free Press, knocking down orange barrels, avoiding potholes, changing lanes without turn signals: MICHIGAN

3:09 PM - 27 views - 6 eprops - 5 comments - email it

Sunday, April 08, 2007

It stands beyond the prospect of belief

There is absolutely no chance you will believe this (hence the Macbeth quotation), so go ahead and do it yourself. Go to www.google.com and click on maps. Type "cincinnati to london" in the search bar. Read through the instructions. It will give directions to Long Wharf, and then the instruction will read "Swim across the Atlantic Ocean" and it will give you the distance required. Then it continues as though you still had your car and you still were trying to get to london.

Other Google humor: (Warning: only funny if you have read/seen Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy [miserable movie, good book]) Go to the google and type "answer to life the universe and everything" without the quotation marks. It will tell you that the answer is 42.

6:28 PM - 17 views - 4 eprops - 2 comments - email it

Next 5 >>